Dharmasena case illustrates what is wrong with complaints procedures.
نویسندگان
چکیده
A junior doctor who acted in the best interests of his patient as he saw it has found himself before a criminal court, suspended, and subjected to a trust inquiry and a future General Medical Council hearing. Such multiple jeopardy is unreasonable. Obstetricians condemned these actions, and the patient was quoted as saying, “I am concerned about being labelled as the first woman in the UK involved in an FGM [female genital mutilation] prosecution.” This prosecution was not in the patient’s interest. This case may undermine public confidence by misrepresenting how obstetricians view FGM. Recently the president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists stated: “this college abhors FGM as the very serious abuse of girls and young women. We must do everything we can to end this obnoxious practice.” This prosecution has served only to harm victims of FGM, because doctors and midwives may now hesitate when managing perineal trauma after delivery. A paper was recently published on the impact of complaints procedures on the wellbeing and clinical practice of doctors. It highlighted the association between complaints procedures and serious psychological morbidity in doctors, including suicidal ideation. In 2013 the Berwick report emphasised that fear is toxic to patient safety, yet other than fear, how are junior obstetricians and midwives likely to feel when they see what can happen to a colleague? Perhaps the intolerable situation this doctor found himself in will be a tipping point and will lead to reform. If so, his ordeal may have had a purpose. The public administration select committee is investigating how complaints are managed. It has started by proposing a transparent, collaborative, accountable, and legally protected model. As the Berwick report stated: “supervisory and regulatory systems should be simple and clear, avoid diffusion of responsibility, and be respectful of the goodwill and sound intention of the vast majority of staff.”
منابع مشابه
COVID-19 epidemic: What happens to other routine patients admitted in the emergency department?
Four weeks have passed from the first reported case of covid-19 in Iran. During the past month, thousands of patients ran to emergency departments (EDs) due to respiratory complaints. From the beginning of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, EDs have become particular units for admitting patients with respiratory complaints. The question is “what happens to other routine patients of ED?”
متن کاملPostpartum Haemorrhage: Still a Big Issue in Maternity Care - What is Going Wrong?
Background and aim: Postpartum haemorrhage remains one of the main leading causes of maternal mortality across the world. This is despite a wide-spread coverage of active third stage of labour care in many countries. Reflecting on emerging evidence in this context, a discussion of associated factors which should be considered in interpretation of the evidence and its implications is presented ...
متن کاملDynamic Diagnosis (Position Paper)
Recent research in diagnosis (Mcllraith, 1997; Thielscher, 1997; McIlraith, 1998) extends earlier works in diagnosis fi’om first principles by using an action theory instead of a first-order theory to describe the correct behavior of the system in consideration. The action theory allows us to reason about actions and their effects. Thus, when an action does not yield the expected effects someth...
متن کاملComplaints against family physicians submitted to disciplinary tribunals in the Netherlands: lessons for patient safety.
PURPOSE We analyzed the disciplinary law verdicts concerning family physicians, submitted to the Dutch disciplinary law system, to identify domains of high risk of harm for patients in family practice. METHODS The Dutch disciplinary law system offers patients the opportunity to file complaints against physicians outside a legal malpractice system, without possibility of financial compensation i...
متن کاملThe prescription and practice of work on the flight deck
Technological change has led to the proceduralisation of flight deck work. Yet accidents attributable to pilot error still occur. CSCW studies of work suggest work as prescribed does not always reflect work as practised. While one might expect this to be less true of safety critical settings like the flight deck, the case studies we present provide support for this distinction. We present two r...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 350 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015